Featured Article

Featured Article
Hamlet Summary

Architecture

Architecture
Learn About Early Temple Design

Featured Video

Featured Video
Memory of the Camps

Resume

Resume
Current Resume

Pages

Hamlet the Play within a Play

Thursday, January 28, 2010



By: Brian Freeman


William Shakespeare is an important literary writer. He is responsible for many famous plays. Hamlet is just one of these many plays. Hamlet is about a young prince by the name Hamlet. Prince Hamlet is known for his indecisiveness. A ghost, who appears to be his father, pays a visit to Prince Hamlet and instructs him to kill King Claudius. The ghost explains that the person responsible for his untimely death is King Claudius. He wants to abide by his father but he ends up hurting others in the process. Prince Hamlet’s indecisiveness affects his lover Ophelia, his mother Gertrude, and his uncle King Claudius before losing his own life.

Ophelia is the daughter of Polonius, the Lord Chamberlain. She is Prince Hamlet’s lover. Hamlet states, “I love Ophelia: Forty thousand brothers could not, with all their quantity of love, make up my sum” (5.1.241-243). Prince Hamlet mistakenly kills Polonius. This drives Ophelia to insanity. The Queen tells Ophelia’s brother, Laertes, of her death. She states, “One woe doth tread upon another’s heel, so fast they follow: your sister’s drowned, Laertes” (4.7.163, 164). Ophelia’s death remains uncertain whether it was suicide or just an accident.

King Claudius takes Queen Gertrude as his new wife. Queen Gertrude is also Prince Hamlet’s mother. Hamlet states, “…You are the queen, your husband’s brother’s wife; And – would it were not so! – you are my mother” (3.4.15, 16). Prince Hamlet is not happy with his mother’s relationship to his father’s murderer. Prince Hamlet and Laertes have a duel. During the duel, Queen Gertrude drinks from a poisoned cup that is meant for Prince Hamlet. The queen states, “No, no, the drink, - O my dear Hamlet, - The drink, the drink! I am poisoned” (5.2.282-283). The Queen dies after she speaks these words.

King Claudius is Prince Hamlet’s murdered father’s brother. Prince Hamlet is very upset about King Claudius marrying his widowed mother only two months after his father’s death. Prince Hamlet states, “…married with my uncle, my father’s brother…” (1.2.151, 152). Hamlet attempts to kill Claudius after his father’s ghost visits him. He kills Polonius instead. Claudius then realizes he must take some type of action against Prince Hamlet. Claudius arranges Prince and Laertes to duel one another. Claudius also arranges for Laertes sword tip to be uncovered and poisoned so that there will be no mistake made. A cup filled with poison awaits Prince Hamlet as well. Prince Hamlet eventually carries out his father’s wish and stabs King Claudius with the poisoned tipped sword that was meant for himself. Prince Hamlet states, “Here thou incestuous, murderous, damned, Dane, Drink off this potion:” (5.2.298).

As the play unfolds, it is clear that Prince Hamlet’s indecisiveness affect those around him. Prince Hamlet’s inability to carry out his father’s wish changes his whole life. He accidentally kills Ophelia’s father, Polonius. The death of Polonius sends Ophelia into insanity which ends in her death. After several tragic events, all of the people that Prince Hamlet loves and loathes pass away. This includes his mother, his uncle, and himself. These tragic events occur due to Prince Hamlet’s inability to trust his father’s ghost and he fails to follow his last wish.

Overview of Frederick Hart

By: Brian Freeman

There have been many great American sculpture artists in the last twentieth century. These artists, with names like Samuel Yellin, Richard Serra, and John Henry Waddell, brought the revival of figurative sculpture back to America. However, there is one great twentieth century American sculpture artist, whom, by himself, created a new medium of artwork - Frederick Hart. Frederick Hart, born in Atlanta, Georgia but raised in South Carolina is a sculpture artist who’s work is known for being figurative, neo-Victorian, and light capturing. His art does not fit in the "mainstream art world" which is dominated by non-traditional movements such as Pop art. Hart's figurative sculpture is out of the fashion, but Hart's heroic and religious style has gained him fame and monumental respect.

Some of Frederick Hart’s most widely known and famous works include several American National Monuments. The most famous piece is bronze statue The Three Soldiers located at the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington D.C. This sculpture depicts three soldiers facing the Vietnam Memorial wall. Hart describes his work by saying, “I place these figures upon the shore of that sea, gazing upon it (the memorial wall), standing vigil before it, reflecting the human face of it, the human heart. The portrayal of the figures is consistent with history. They wear the uniform and carry the equipment of war; they are young.” The second most famous of Hart's work is The Creation located at Washington National Cathedral also in Washington, D.C. Made from Indiana limestone The Creation took Hart thirteen years to complete and is said by Hart to depict a "seething cauldron of swirling motion of human forms emerging - hands, faces, bodies - swept up in the exultation of being given life."

Hart's more intimate works of art are his clear acrylic sculptures. Hart pioneered the use of acrylics in figurative sculpture, a technique which he calls "sculpting with light." This new medium of artwork is the complete creation of Hart. The process in which Hart does his acrylic work has numerous United States patents. These acrylic sculptures of light are truly inventive and revolutionary. The figures are classic while his medium of clear acrylic is modern and technologically advanced. The Harts most famous acrylic piece is the The Cross of the Millennium. In The Cross of the Millennium Hart depicts a Christ figure embedded and seen rising through the faceted star of Bethlehem. In May, 1997 Hart followed the tradition of the great Renaissance and baroque masters who have presented works to the Pope for over 1000 years. Hart meeting Pope John Paul II at a private ceremony in the Papal study in Rome presented The Cross of the Millennium to Pope John Paul II in celebration of the coming 2000 year anniversary of Christ's birth. Pope John Paul II later proclaimed, "This work represents a profound theological statement for our day."

Frederick Hart was truly talented artist who worked in stone, bronze, marble and clear acrylic. Sadly at age fifty six Frederick Hart died of a heart attack. However, the body of work he has created over more than twenty years heralds a new age for contemporary art. Harts creation of art and a new form of medium for new artist to explorer is legacy which will not be forgotten. Frederick Hart is survived by Lindy Hart and they are the parents of two sons, Lain and Alexander.

www.frederickhart.com/

www.lahainagalleries.com/frederick_hart.htm

www.cfmgallery.com/artists/Hart/

Review of the Shoah Foundation

By: Brian Freeman

“The Shoah Foundation.” September 04, 2007. Online: http:// www.vhf.org.

The Holocaust was one of the most central events of the twentieth century. During the time of Nazi Germany, under the rule of Hitler, millions of Jews were murdered. This tragic event affected everyone that lived during that time. Although many died, there were also many people who survived this horrific event. The survivors’ stories of prejudice, intolerance, bigotry and suffering are ones that should never be forgotten. In today’s digital age we now have the power and ability to preserve these historical stories of the survivors of the Holocaust so that future generations will always be able to educate themselves on the Holocaust. There are many foundations that preserve these historical testimonies. One such foundation is the Shoah Foundation, which is partnered with one of the strongest educational institutions in America.

The Shoah Foundation, also known as the Survivors of the Shoah Visual History Foundation, is a non-profit organization. The foundation was originally established by Academy Award winning director Steven Spielberg in 1994, one year after completing the ground breaking Holocaust film Schindler's List. In 1994, the foundation’s original goals were to document the experiences of Holocaust survivors and other witnesses, including those who aided, rescued, and liberated the survivors. In the first six years the foundation collected nearly 52,000 testimonies from fifty-six countries and in thirty two languages. In each testimony, one survivor or witness speaks about his or her life before, during, and after the Holocaust.

The Shoah Foundation partnered with University of Southern California in 2006. Since the partnership the foundation has been slowly making the testimonial videos more accessible to public educators and the general public. The foundation’s website, which is hosted by USC, can be easily accessed by the web address www.vhf.org. On the site there are many pages about the history, future plans, and general frequently asked questions about the foundation. The best part of the website is not text information that it gives but rather the interactive videos and testimonial videos that are displayed. All the available videos are in a QuickTime format which makes them easily accessible to both Windows and Mac users. The videos can be streamed from the website but not downloaded to a computer. The website also allows you to do massive searches on the online archive. The videos the site contains consist of testimonies from survivors of the Nazi death camps. A majority of the videos are accounts from Jewish, handicapped, and homosexual survivors that have been derived from personal interviews with members of The Shoah Foundation. The testimonies have been edited for time purposes and run approximately ten to thirty minutes in length.

In addition to the personal testimonies, the site also contains various interactive videos that include reenactments. One exceptional video, which is produced by Steven Spielberg, is Voices of the Holocaust. It is an interactive web video that can be accessed in the online exhibition portion of the site. Voices of the Holocaust is narrated by a star studded cast featuring Peter Coyote, Elijah Wood, and Natalie Portman. Voices of the Holocaust highlights testimonies from four survivors who were children during the Holocaust. The video allows interaction with the testimonies, while simultaneously exploring historical overviews, archival film footage, a glossary, maps, and survivors’ personal photos.

In conclusion, The Shoah Foundation website is very impressive in its sheer video content and easy to use in design. The promise of more videos and online exhibits in the future gives the site more educational value. The foundation and site has really grown since initial funding from Steven Spielberg in 1994. It now has life beyond the support of a single individual. With the enjoyed partnership of USC, individual donors and corporate donations provide the crucial funding to advance the foundation’s mission and strategic goals. The actions that the foundation are taking will truly be remembered. By digitizing, cataloguing, and indexing those who survived the Holocaust through www.vhf.org ensures that their stories and faces will never be forgotten for years to come.

Band of Brothers episode summary of "Why We Fight"














By: Brian Freeman

Steven Spielberg and his movies have forever changed the movie industry. Spielberg has dedicated his life to making great movies that not only entertain us but give us insight to the reality of human nature. Among all of Steven Spielberg’s amazing and award winning movies, his dramatization of World War II seems to have the most effect on people. Spielberg’s movies Saving Private Ryan and Schindler’s List are the highest grossing World War II based movies ever. Spielberg has dominated the movie industry and knew there were more World War II stories to be told. When Spielberg and lead man Tom Hanks from Saving Private Ryan approached HBO to do a television show about a group of American paratroopers in World War II, no one knew the impact of interest that would ignite.

Band of Brothers is a ten-part video series of the dramatic history of E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne, known as “Easy Company.” Although the company’s first experience in real combat did not come until June 1944 (D-Day), this exemplary group fought in some of the war’s most harrowing battles and saw the worst of Nazi Germany. Band of Brothers depicts not only the heroism of their exploits but also the extraordinary bond among men formed in the crucible of war. Based on the book Band of Brothers, written by historian and biographer Stephen Ambrose the series has became a huge success. The series has won six Emmys and a Golden Globe for Best Miniseries or Motion Picture Made for Television.

One of the most compelling episodes of Band of Brothers is Why We Fight. In the Episode we find the battle harden men of Easy Company in Germany where they find no enemy resistance. In fact, they find warm beds and hot meals in the houses they commandeer. Many of the men go about looting the German homes and farms for food and valuables. They find the "enemy" to be industrious and not much different from them. Many of the soldiers wonder why they are even at war with the Germans. Major Winters is concerned about his friend Captain Nixon who returns from a disastrous combat jump with another unit cynical about the war and drinking heavily. Nixon goes on search for a specific alcoholic drink. Nixon breaks into a German home looking for his booze, and he finds he has broken into a highly decorated German Soldiers home. The soldier is not there, but his wife finds Nixon. They say nothing to each other, only blank stares. Nixon walks out, slamming the door on his exit. Half way through the episode a patrol makes a gruesome discovery of a small concentration camp in the woods of Landsberg. The camp was a part of the sub camps of the Dachau concentration camp. The men are horrified at what they find. They find starving and dying men lying everywhere. Those still alive were living in horrible conditions and begging for food and water. The dead bodies are piled so high that they steam of gases. Several of the combat-hardened veterans break down when they see the condition of the prisoners. They immediately begin passing out rations and water. They go to a nearby town and steal food from the local people to feed the prisoners. The locals pretend to know nothing of the camp much to the anger of the soldiers. The soldiers were thinking that the prisoners were criminals. They were shocked to learn that the men who have been starved and murdered at the camp are not criminals but Jews, Poles, and Gypsies.

The men struggle on deciding what they should do with the survivors. Finally the chief medical officer arrives and in a tragic twist of irony and to the dismay of the soldiers they are ordered to relock the gates and ordered to stop giving food to the prisoners. The chief medical officer’s reason for his decision was because giving the starving prisoners too much food would kill them. He also wanted to keep them contained so they could monitor their recovery. The division commander forces the local population to do mandatory cleanup of the camp. The local men and women are dismayed and horrified at the sight. They are forced to move the dead bodies to mass graves. Many of the local men cry as they dig graves and move the skeleton corpses. In one scene a group of women grab a corpse to be moved and the rotted flesh peels off in their hands. Captain Nixon monitors the progress and is no longer drinking. He walks through the camp staring at the burning bodies and the mass graves. Nixon stares out and then sees a lone woman dragging a dead body. While she is struggling with the body, Nixon instantly recognizes the woman. She was the wife of the German Soldier whose house he had broken into. They both stare at each other and Nixon realizes what he is fighting for.

Why They Fight had some of the most visually outstanding scenes of all the series. The episode captured the humanity of the American soldiers and gave the characters back their heart. Band of Brothers is truly one of Steven Spielberg’s greatest works. Not just for this episode but for the entire series. Band of Brothers ranks among one of the great television shows and Why We Fight will be remembered as one of the best episodes among the series.

Hanks, Tom and Spielberg, Stevens. Band of Brothers Special Edition Box Set, Dreamworks Picture,2002.

Voltaire the Historiographer

By Brian Freeman

The Enlightenment, or Age of Reason, was a time of great intellectual and moral growth for humanity. This period gave us many great figures whose works and ideas influenced important thinkers of both the American and French Revolutions. One of the greatest Enlightenment figures was François-Marie Arouet, better known by the pen name Voltaire. Voltaire was a prolific French writer who was an outspoken supporter of political and religious reform. Voltaire produced works in almost every literary form: plays, poetry, novels, essays, historical and scientific works, over 20,000 letters and over two thousand books and pamphlets. He is most famous for his plays, poetry and novels, but what is relatively unknown is his contribution as a historian and the way he influenced how history was recorded. Voltaire’s role as a historian brings philosophy and reasoning to his work. Voltaire the historian rejected the biography style of his time, questioned bias of sources, and suggested that early historiography is full of false evidence.

Voltaire was born in 1694 to a wealthy family in Paris, and given the name Francois-Marie Arouet. During the early years of his life, Arouet endured many hardships. For instance, his mother passed away when he was seven, leaving only his father and older brother to raise him. Author of Voltaire’s biography, James Parton, points out, “this added insult to injury as Voltaire despised both his father and brother.”[1] His other hardships stemmed from the fact that Voltaire lived in the time period in which society strictly obeyed the rules of the church. According to Thomas Munck, “Faith in the church was an obligation for everyone in society and the authority of the church was never questioned, for this would definitely mean instant death.”[2] Despite this influence, Voltaire, later in his life, would constantly challenge and insult the church. In 1704, Voltaire enrolled at the Jesuit College of Louis-Le-Grande where he excelled in academics, especially in his writing skills. While there, he studied literature, despite his father's wishes that he pursue a career in law. Furthermore, Voltaire received a great deal of theatrical education, as well as a sound liberal education, both of which would serve him later in life.

In his early twenties Voltaire was imprisoned in the Bastille for his writings about Louis XV's regent and Philippe II, Duke of Orléans. Rebecca H Gross states, “In spite of his protestations of innocence, he was sent to the Bastille for eleven months (1717-1718).”[3] This would not be the last time Voltaire would be imprisoned for his writing. Voltaire was subject to brief spells in prison and even exiled for his controversial remarks about the French Monarch government and the Catholic Church. Despite the exiles, imprisonment, and constant pressure by the government, Voltaire did not stop writing. Instead, the imprisonments encouraged his writing. Actually, it was during this time of trouble with the law that Arouet adopted the pen name Voltaire. According to James Parton, “after choosing the new name, Voltaire said, ‘I was very unlucky under my first name. I want to see if this one will succeed any better.’”[4] However another biography writer Rebecca H.Gross states, “There were his social ambitions, which could have prompted him to deny his bourgeois origin and call himself by an entirely different name…”[5]

The name change for Voltaire would prove to be very successful. He would be very successful and collect a very large fortune for his writing. There was no doubt that Voltaire was a great writer. Thomas Munck points out, “Only a single well known writer of the eighteenth century was really wealthy, namely Voltaire. He was any case exceptional in that he had set about systematically amassing so substantial a fortune that he became totally independent both of patrons and of publishers.”[6] One of Voltaire’s most successful writings is the Candide. The Candide, written in 1764, is known as one of the world’s greatest satires. In the Candide Voltaire pokes fun at much of Europe and attacks simple human follies and frailties. Most of the characters are brutally killed or fiercely hurt for idiotic reasons. According to The Longman Anthology of World Literature, “Candide attacks the widespread idealist system of philosophical optimism, which could be seen as justifying human suffering as a necessary part of a cosmic order beyond human ken, implicitly condoning a passive resistance to the effort required to prevent or alleviate suffering.” [7] The Longman Anthology of World Literature goes on to state, “It was an immediate bestseller, reprinted about forty times during its first year and soon translated into several European languages.”[8]

Voltaire’s historical writings were not only very successful, but they were also extremely profitable. His very first historical writing, Histoire de Charles XII released in 1731, sold numerous copies. According to Rebecca H. Gross, “Within three years, Jore printed five editions of the Histoire de Charles XII. Each edition was almost as big as the first 2,600 copies because, within these three years, more than 10,000 copies of the works were sold.”[9] The profitability of Histoire de Charles XII can be contributed to Voltaire’s view and style in which he believed history should be written completely different than from the other writers of his time. The Encyclopedia of Historians and Historical Writing praises Voltaire’s style by stating, “The result of Voltaire’s endeavor was a noncommittal and a free account of the sovereign, which contrasted substantially with the detailed and pointless biography of the same king written by his chaplain.”[10] Unlike other historians of his time, Voltaire not only wrote about King Charles, but he also captured how the King’s actions changed the society and civilization of his people. The style Voltaire used to achieve this “was revolutionary in that it treated a contemporary subject, the king of Sweden, and its object was to show that the ambitions of even the most admirable warrior brought nothing but disaster to his nation.”[11] Voltaire strayed from the typical historians of his day by analyzing the personal strengths and shortcomings of an individual rather than simply presenting a timeline of their life. As a result, “Voltaire founded a new genre, now known as Kulturgeschicte,” which “widened the scope of history from a record of events to a survey of civilization.”[12] Voltaire continued to revitalize historical writing by using the narrative. The author Bruce Mazlish of The Riddle of History goes in more depth into the reason Voltaire used the narrative. He states, “Voltaire was not interested in offering a causal analysis of historical change. He wished, rather, to offer a ‘picture of an age,’ to depict the state of human reason at a given point.”[13] Mazlish goes on to state, “He frequently used the narrative form. But this was partly because it came naturally to him as superb storyteller, and partly because it kept the reader’s interest more readily.”[14] Overall, using the narrative, in combination with his philosophical presentation, Voltaire produced exquisite works of literature that made him one of the most famous historians of his time.

Voltaire’s most famous work was Age of Louis XIV. Encouraged by his first try as a historian, Voltaire immediately began work the following year on his historical masterpiece, Age of Louis XIV. Released finally in 1751, Age of Louis XIV would be a culmination of more than twenty years of methodical and careful study of all available sources, both oral and written. From this mass data, Voltaire compiled the history and success of the French as a nation by presenting the state of mind of a century. Similar to his first historical writing, Histoire de Charles XII, Age of Louis XIV “constituted a radical departure from traditional accounts by emphasizing the selection of cultural and intellectual facts, rather than a mere listing of events.”[15]

Voltaire would go on to write several more historical writings, with the most important being Essay on the Manners and Sprit of Nations, The Philosophy of History, and The Pyrrhonism of History. This writings continued Voltaire’s theme of focusing on the cultural and philosophical aspects of civilization. The Essay on the Manners and Sprit of Nations “reflects the secular and liberal sprit of Voltaire as applied to a world history, and was the first of its kind to treat of topics outside of Europe.”[16] Instead, he gave the description of China, India, and Persia, followed by a focus on the history of Christianity. The Philosophy of History would again be another highly controversial writing. In this historical writing, Voltaire directly attacked the Catholic Church with the intention “to mean a rational history of civilization independent of divine intervention.”[17] The Pyrrhonism of History seriously questioned historiography as a genre, “questioning not only such predecessors as Herodotus and Bossuet, but moving on to expose dubious sources.”[18] .

As a result of these influential writings, the man who began as François Marie Arouet now exists in history under the pen name Voltaire. Under this name, he became famous during the Enlightenment for his satirical writings about major issues; yet, he was also respected as an exceptional philosopher, progressive author, and a leading figure of the Enlightenment. In a time with strict censorship laws and harsh penalties for those who broke them, Voltaire fought to have his ideas heard. In doing so, he became a great historian of his time by holding true to his promise to forsake useless details, and to write only about “that which is worth your knowing; the sprit, custom, the practices of the principal nations, based on the facts which one cannot ignore.”[19] Thus, it is apparent that Voltaire left a legacy that history is not only a series of facts and events, but also how people react to those events and how society evolves from those reactions. This legacy is evident through not only a vast collection of writings, but also a world that has been radically and directly affected by these works and the activities of their author, Voltaire. Overall, Voltaire will always be remembered as a writer, a satirist, and a crusader against tyranny and bigotry. Essentially, he is the embodiment of the 18th Century Enlightenment.


[1] James Parton. The Life of Voltaire.(Cambridge: Houghton, Mifflin and Press, 1981), 23.

[2] Thomas Munck, The Enlightenment. (New York: Oxford University Press,2000), 8.

[3] Rebecca H. Gross, Voltaire Nonconformist. (New York: Philosophical Library, 1965), 43.

[4] James Parton. The Life of Voltaire.(Cambridge: Houghton, Mifflin and Press, 1981) 23,

[5] Rebecca H. Gross, Voltaire Nonconformist. (New York: Philosophical Library, 1965), 44.

[6] Thomas Munck, The Enlightenment. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 214.

[7] The Longman Anthology of World Literature. (New York: Pearson Longham, 2008), 1911.

[8] Ibid, 1911

[9] Rebecca H. Gross, Voltaire Nonconformist. (New York: Philosophical Library, 1965), 79.

[10] Encyclopedia Historians and Historical Writing, 1st ed., s.v. "Voltaire."

[11] Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Volume 7., s.v. “Voltaire,Franicois-Marie Arouet De”

[12] Rebecca H. Gross, Voltaire Nonconformist. (New York: Philosophical Library, 1965), 153.

[13] Bruce Mazlish, The Riddle of History.(Massachusetts: Minerva Press,1966),68.

[14] Ibid 69,69

[15] Encyclopedia Historians and Historical Writing, 1st ed., s.v. "Voltaire."

[16] Encyclopedia Historians and Historical Writing, 1st ed., s.v. "Voltaire."

[17] Ibid

[18] Ibid

[19] Bruce Mazlish, The Riddle of History.(Massachusetts: Minerva Press,1966),59

Article Review: How to Find a Brothel in Ancient Pompeii

By: Brian Freeman

McGinn, Thomas A. J. “How to Find a Brothel in Pompeii.” Archaeology Odyssey 7/1 (Jan/Feb 2004):18-25, 62.

The article “How to Find a Brothel in Pompeii” is not for the faint of heart. The article describes pictures that once made the bashful Mark Twain write, “no pen could have the hardihood to describe.” To fully understand the article and understand the arguments the reader needs to know the definition of the word brothel. The Webster dictionary describes a brothel as a building where prostitutes are available and the synonym says to look up whorehouse. The author of the article looks at many different views and explicit detail on what makes a brothel in the archeology terms. The author first focuses on the certain criteria set forth by the researcher Andrew Wallace Hadrill of the British school in Rome and which argues with other researcher views.

The author gives clear examples why a criteria is needed. One great example is how in 1994 two separate studies published that year, added up the number of buildings previously identified as brothels and came up with a total number of thirty five or more. The archaeological criteria set by Andrew Wallace helps narrow down the astonishing numbers. The criteria that a brothel must complete to be considered by Andrew Wallace was erotic art, erotic graffiti and raised masonry platforms that would function as beds. Wallace argues just because a building has erotic art and graffiti does not mean it is a brothel. Graffiti could just represent insults, and nothing more. Many private homes contained erotic sculpture as well as erotic lamps, drinking cups and mirrors. Under the Andrew Wallace criteria the number dwindles to one. The only structure in Pompeii to satisfy the criteria is the popular tourist attraction called Lupanar. Lupanar is the most certain example of an ancient brothel not only in Pompeii but the entire Roman world. Lupanar has great examples of erotic art with various images of men and women depicted in a variety of sexual positions and over 120 pieces of erotic graffiti. The graffiti scratched on the walls tell the names of prostitutes and in some cases the sexual acts the prostitutes could perform with occasional reference to the price. The most notable of all among the evidence is the raised masonry beds.

The Author makes a very good examples and warning against why the Andrew Wallace Hadrill criteria may be flawed. The one great example of how the Hadrill criterion is flawed are the bath house of Terme Sububane. The two story bath house were made so the Pompeian’s could receive baths and exfoliation treatments. The author says “A trip to the Treme Sububane was, of course, invigorating and refreshing. But were other pleasures available there?” On the wall inside the apodyteruim changing room of the Treme Sububane series of erotic paintings exist. Along with images there is literary and legal text that confirms the sale of sex in baths. There is however only one sure example of erotic graffito found in the bath. The author says “ The graffito sets the cost for a prostitutes services at 16 asses, a relatively high price in Pompeii, where the going rate for a prostitute was in most recorded cases two asses, the price of a loaf of bread.” One of the more hilarious arguments made about the baths and probably in the article is the views Luciana Jacobelli. Jacobelli suggest that the erotic paintings of the Terme Sububane may have served as mnemonic devices to help bathers recall where they had stored their clothing almost like numbers in a parking garage.

The article How to Find a Brothel in Pompeii is very informative and gives large insight to the problem archeologist have trying to distinguish a brothel. The information given helps the reader come to their own theories on what makes a brothel. The article greatly gives knowledge into the ancient sexual habits of the Roman world.

Book Review:Oren, Michael. Six Days of War June 1967 and the Making of the Modern Middle East















By: Brian Freeman

Michael Oren’s Six Days of War June 1967 and the Making of the Modern Middle East is a riveting account and thoroughgoing analysis of the events leading up to the Six Days War. In his work, Oren skillfully captures the geographic, social, cultural, and political effect the war had on the Middle East. Six Days of War June 1967 and the Making of the Modern Middle East is arguably one of the most comprehensive history books ever published on the Six Day War. Oren provides incredible details, offering background information for the causes and the major political leaders. Oren draws from a number of American, Russian, and Israeli archives, along with Syrian and Jordanian sources to provide political insight into the thoughts and actions of most of the major players before, during, and after the war. In some instances, Oren uses these sources to give an hour-by-hour description of events during the war. Unfortunately, however, Oren’s use of detail causes the book to become dry and boring descriptions of battles and battlefield decisions in some places.

In the first four chapters, Oren explains the roots of Zionism and sets the stage for the war in terms of culture, politics, and religion. Oren main argument is that the Six Day war is about water rather than Jewish state. Oren presents solid evidence that the Arab states, in a gross miscalculation, ratcheted pressure to the point where Israel was forced to act preemptively in order to assure its survival. Oren made extensive use of sources to give insight to what the major actors were thinking during the entire saga. Each of the figures that play a significant role in the coming conflict is described in great detail. Oren allows us to see both their flaws and their courage, regardless of which side they were on. Most important, however, is that historical facts are marshaled effectively in between the political intrigue of the situation.

One of the most interesting parts of the book is the dynamic relationship between the United States and Israel. Oren chronicles Israel's political struggle with the United States and the Soviet Union to permit an appropriate military response to Egypt's provocations. Israeli leaders then as now, tried to strike balances between competing pressures and goals, while attaining both security and international approval, and showing willingness for peace without appearing militarily weak. The strength of Israel’s military was best exemplified by the fact that even though the Soviet influence was extremely powerful in the Middle East region, the Muslim leaders could not join together to defeat the Israeli threat. The Israeli victory in the Six Day War contained an amazingly high number of fateful decisions, meticulous planning, and overall dumb luck. The dumb luck of Israel was the absence of unity among the Arab nations and the fact that the Arab troops were completely unprepared. The tactical atrocities of Syria that involve the refusal to send in reinforcements still remain unexplained, however.

One of the most ironic sections of the book involves the Arab lies about how the war was being won. Arab media was reporting to the people that the Arab armies were smashing the Israelis even as those armies were being pummeled into near non-existence. Once the truth was finally revealed, people’s disappointment grew and became even more tragic and difficult to take. Oren’s crowing achievement is the use of massive detail explaining the Israel battle strategy and political thought. Covering the battles minute by minute and with Oren commentary is one of the most interesting parts of the book. Oren is able to capture the incredible one-sided victory and comment that even Israel's generals found it difficult to believe it was happening. Israel, having proved it could not be defeated militarily as well as possessing something to trade, hoped for comprehensive peace. Tragically, that peace would never be found though. The Israeli victory of the Six Days War would have massive implications for creation of the modern tensions of the Middle East

Oren’s extraordinary research provides him with the ability to give detailed descriptions of all the participants. The Arabs, Israelis, Soviets, and Americans make the Six Days of War June 1967 and the Making of the Modern Middle East an essential reading for anyone seeking to understand the history of the troubled region. Oren’s detailed storytelling of how the war broke out and the shocking ways it unfolded make it a compelling read. On the other hand, because of Oren’s use of intense detail, the pace of the book slows down considerably. Oren makes up for this however, by tracing the military course of the war and its political aftermath, including lingering tensions in the Middle East. The Six Day War was in many ways the most pivotal event for the creation of the modern Middle East, and Oren’s narrative storytelling truly captures the event. Ultimately, Six Days of War June 1967 and the Making of the Modern Middle East paints a fascinating portrait of the war that still dictates Mid-East negotiations.

Oren, Michael. Six Days of War June 1967 and the Making of the Modern Middle East. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.

 

2009 ·Digital Factory by TNB